Strategic Dimensions Of Sourcing And Shoring Techniques

. Strategic Dimensions of Sourcing and Shoring Techniques There are a multitude of strategic dimensions associated with sourcing and shoring techniques in the marketplace, conducting business abroad, and conducting business on the home front, or near the home place. These strategic dimensions include (a) domestic outsourcing (b) insourcing (c) backsourcing (d) offshoring (e) offshore outsourcing (f) onshoring (g) nearshoring (h) strategic outsourcing (i) business process outsourcing (BPO) and (j) offshore service providers (OSPs). These sourcing and shoring techniques can be complicated to understand. Domestic outsourcing is when a company decides to let go of an in-house job to go to another domestic company to perform (Koku, 2009). Insourcing is bringing back work internally that was previously outsourced (Nodoushani McKnight, 2012). Backsourcing is rescinding the product or service back to the home country where it came from originally. Offshoring is when a company from one country outsources work to businesses in another country by eit her conducting operations in the foreign country, or subcontracting this work out through outsource providers who then transfer this work overseas (Chadee Ramen, 2009; Koku, 2009). Offshore outsourcing is a hybrid of domestic outsourcing and offshoring, in which a company totally transfers jobs to another company that is foreign-based which has no relation whatsoever to the domestic affiliate, for example, Delta Airlines contractingShow MoreRelatedZara Strategy4700 Words   |  19 Pages In 1988, Zara’s first international store was opened in the city of Oporto in Portugal. Spain and Portugal are quite similar in many aspects from culture to food and this soon proved to be true for fashion too. This was a somewhat cautious and strategic attempt by Inditex to gain sufficient market share at home, in the region with which it is familiar before venturing into the other fashion cities where there is higher competition (New York in 1989 and Paris in1990). Zara’s mission statement Zara’sRead MoreOperation and Supply Chain Management8662 Words   |  35 Pagesmanufacturing, service amp; health care processes *4. strategic capacity management *4A. learning curves 5. process analysis 5A. job design amp; work measurement 6. production process 6A. facility layout *7. service processes *7A. waiting line analysis *8. health care processes 9. six sigma quality 9A. process capability and SPC 10. projects Sec III- supply chain process *11. global sourcing amp; procurement (purchasing) 12. location, logisticsRead MoreTraining Performance Appraisal Career Management6842 Words   |  28 Pagesresults can be evaluated. IV. Designing Training and Development Programme Every training and development programme must address certain vital issues 1. Who participates in the programme? 2. Who are the trainers? 3. What methods and techniques are to be used for training? 4. What should be the level of training? 5. What learning principles are needed? 6. Where is the program conducted? 7. Who are the trainers: Trainers should be selected on the basis of self-nominationRead MoreEssay on Tanglewood 13522 Words   |  15 Pageschain of retail store selling items like appliances, electronics, and home dà ©cor. As and external consultant for staffing service, I will write a report for the Director of Staffing services giving my opinion about the application of each of the strategic staffing decisions below. †¢ Acquire or Develop Talent I would recommend that Tanglewood develop talent.    Developing talents will promote the employees morale, and help the organization    maintain a productive workforce. Acquiring talent will costRead MoreWalmart Case Analysis11203 Words   |  45 Pagesglobally. With the board of directors being given the commitment of 7.5% growth globally and 7% US market growth after the company had achieved 10% growth in preceding years, the need for capitalizing on the company’s core strengths is turning into a strategic priority. While the Low Price Every Day (LPED) value proposition has been changed to Save Money, Live Better, Wal-Mart still faces the daunting challenge of becoming relevant in high growth economies of China and India where the company’s core messageRead MoreLearning from the Fashion Industry: a Structured Literature Review39302 Words   |  158 Pages.......... 55 4.9.5 De-coupling point approach ............................................................ .......... 58 4.9.6 Leagile supply chain approaches............................................................... 59 4.10 GLOBAL VS LOCAL SOURCING ......................................................................... 61 4.11 MANUFACTURING IN THE FASHION INDUSTRY ................................................ 63 4.11.1 Definition of fashion manufacturing...............................Read MoreCase Study20441 Words   |  82 PagesMentor: Prof. (Tarik CAKAR) Performed by: Enis SELAM, Student ID No.08/09.20 Enis_slm@hotmail.com Skopje, July, 2011 2 BRIEF CONTENTS Preface xiii Part I -- Building a Strategic Framework to Analyze Supply Chains Chapter 1 Understanding the Supply Chain Chapter 2 Supply Chain Performance: Achieving Strategic Fit and Scope Chapter 3 Supply Chain Drivers and Metrics Part II -- Designing the Supply Chain Network Chapter 4 Designing Distribution Networks and Applications to e-BusinessRead MoreFundamentals of Hrm263904 Words   |  1056 Pagesof Human Resource Management—10th ed. ISBN-13 978-0470-16968-1 Printed in the United States of America 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Brief Contents PA RT 1 Chapter 1 Chapter 2 UNDERSTANDING HRM The Dynamic Environment of HRM 2 Fundamentals of Strategic HRM 28 PART 2 Chapter 3 Chapter 4 THE LEGAL AND ETHICAL CONTEXT OF HRM Equal Employment Opportunity 56 Employee Rights and Discipline 84 PART 3 Chapter 5 Chapter 6 Chapter 7 STAFFING THE ORGANIZATION Human Resource Planning and Job

What You Should Do to Find Out About Can I Have Sub Topics for My Argument Essay Before Youre Left Behind

What You Should Do to Find Out About Can I Have Sub Topics for My Argument Essay Before You're Left Behind Here's What I Know About Can I Have Sub Topics for My Argument Essay There are lots of aspects about a sport that may be argued in an essay. In choosing your topic, it's frequently a good notion to start out with a subject which you already have some familiarity with. The decision about the topic is dependent upon the student. Every topic is probably going to have an alternate viewpoint and it's vital to take this into consideration. If you've got to write your whole essay in 1 day, do your very best to give yourself breaks so you don't burn out. At some time, you're likely to be requested to compose an argumentative essay. Bear in mind you could make funny argumentative essays if you do a few things. A superior argumentative essay is going to be based on established or new research instead of only on your ideas and feelings. What You Should Do to Find Out About Can I Have Sub Topics for My Argument Essay Before You're Left Behind Inspiration to make your own advertising or media argumentative essay topics isn't really hard to discover. It isn't possible to watch videos, listen to music, and even more. Advertising and the media are now nearly inseparable from society for a whole. Start looking for the international history essay topics in the news or on the internet. Writing for all of us would be your ideal approach to begin earning because you don't necessitate any installation expenses. Do the very f irst research In the start, students do not find resources linked to the topic and frequently get confused. This discussion must occur in direct connection to the research issue. An argumentative essay example will reveal the should possess some critical components which make it better in the practice of convincing. Facts, Fiction and Can I Have Sub Topics for My Argument Essay Becoming in a position to compose a strong argument can help you succeed in society. Essentially, it connects your evidence to your principal argument. You will need to develop a fantastic argument, which encompasses not just your primary point, but also all the pieces which make this up. Finding the most suitable arguments will allow you to prove your point and win. The Can I Have Sub Topics for My Argument Essay Pitfall Place an internet order at this time, and the very best writers will craft you a paper of the maximum quality free of plagiarism. If you're given that the niche, you will need to to think of the kind of paper that you should create. The huge selection of sub-topics confuse the students and they wind up taking a good deal of time to compose a great essay topic. If you select the wrong subject, you might get stuck with your writing and have a difficult time moving forward. Our argumentative essay topic ideas are supposed to save your time when you should choose what things to write about. Researching the topic will enable you to find out more about what fascinates you, and should you pick something you truly like, writing the essay will be more enjoyable. Argumentative essay topics are so important since they are debatableand it's important to at all times be critically contemplating the world around us. Deciding on the proper essay topic can at times be rather challenging. There are several steps that you should take so as to write a fantastic essay. Then take a look at a list of argumentative essay suggestions to help you begin. If you enjoy these remarkable suggestions for history essay topics and history essay prompts, do not neglect to share them with your buddies. Take inspiration from such topic suggestions to compose funny college essays! Can I Have Sub Topics for My Argument Essay - What Is It? Even though both work to the improvement of a business, the broad disparity has the capacity to induce a whole lot of grudge and bad vibes. The modern society has embraced mobile phones in a large way but it has arrived at a price. When you're picking your topic, bear in mind that it's much simpler to write about something which you presently have interest ineven in case you don't know a good deal about it. It's then impossible to learn the particular problems of consumers and to undertake targeted corrective actions. If you feel you aren't going to have the ability to finish your essay by the deadline, you don't understand much regarding the essay subject or you simply don't like this type of assignments, you should turn to professional writers for assistance. Think about the subject of the history essay you've already written before. If you wish to write a great history essay you'd better select a topic that's familiar to you. Locating good essay topics you could discuss effectively and create powerful argumentative essays is a tricky work. Figure out how funny argumentative essay topics can receive the interest of your tutor. Moral argumentative essay topics are a few of the simplest to get carried away with. To locate argumentative essay topics easy on various platforms, you will need to comprehend about the argumentative essay. An argumentative essay is a certain sort of academic writing.

POPULATION REDISTRIBUTION Essay Example For Students

POPULATION REDISTRIBUTION Essay Population redistributions based on ethnicity have defused intense rivalries in the recent past, and could be a solution to the internal ethnic crises for nations such as the former Yugoslavia. Currently described by the media as ethnic cleansing, Population redistributions have been the focus of much controversy throughout U.S. and world history. To those affected, Population redistributions can be economically and emotionally devastating. It can also lead to enormous tragedies causing thousands of deaths when conducted in a brutal manner. The results of various population redistributions are examined throughout this paper with the focus on the Japanese Internment camps in the U.S. and the current crises in the former Yugoslavia. There are examples of population transfers that have taken place in the twentieth century. In 1923, Greece and Turkey signed the Treaty of Lausanne. The two rival nations agreed to expel 150,000 Greeks living in Turkey, and 388,000 Turks living in Greece ba ck to their ethnic homelands. Except in Cyprus where the populations remained mixed. Turkey and Greece have not taken up arms against each other again. After World War II eight million people of German ethnicity were expelled from their native communities in Poland and throughout Eastern Europe, due to agreements made by the Allies at the Potsdam Conference. Hundreds of thousands of Germans died or were killed during the transfer due to the brutal manner in which it was carried out. Due to the lack of diversity and conflicting cultures the long-term results of the population transfer have ended internal ethnic problems in Poland since then. Israel expelled their own settlers from occupied land (which is currently the new Palestinian nation) in order to bring about a lasting peace between the two former rivals. After bombing Pearl Harbor, Hawaii on December 7, 1941, 120,000 Japanese and Japanese-Americans living in Oregon, Washington, California, and Arizona were relocated. They were forced from their homes and put in internment camps for their protection from the rage of the American people and for the sake of national security. Japanese-American internment camps like all issues involving race or war, raises the question of whether or not it was legal and ethical to force Japanese-Americans to move homes and livelihoods in early WWII. It is a difficult and controversial problem. When the decision to relocate thousands of Japanese-Americans was made; the actions were considered to be constitutionally legal and seen by many as necessary. It has been argued as to whether or not it was necessary to put so many innocent people through frustration, suffering, and loss of not only their property but also their freedom. Even before the onset of war, due to the differences in their language, culture, communities, customs, and religion, the Japanese living in America were already alienated from much of society. This made it easier for Americans to justify to themselves the need for a temporary population redistribution of the Japanese-Americans. When the bombing of Pearl Harbor occurred, the American people were afraid of a Japanese attack and of the Japanese living near them on the West Coast. People believed their Japanese-American neighbors were the enemy. Americans were so enraged at Japan that they turned their anger towards Japanese-Americans in the forms of protests, discrimination and violent hatred. The Government, including President Franklin Delano Roosevelt, were pressured by the restlessness of the people, the threat of a Japanese attack, the threat of violence between Americans and Japanese-Americans and the lack of time to take action. Lieutenant General John L. DeWitt was chosen for the job of defending and protecting the West Coast. He became one of the biggest supporters of relocating the Japanese. The FBI began investigating and arresting people along the coast who were suspected of spying for enemy countries. Japanese-Americans were not the only people suspected of spying. Italians and Germans were also investigated and imprisoned. DeWitt received reports of acts of disloyalty to the U.S. and sabotage on the part of Japanese-Americans. He was also inundated with reports of unusual radio activity involving contact with Japanese vessels, of farmers burning their fields in the shapes of markers to aid Japanese pilots, and of fisherman monitoring and relaying to Japan the activity of the U.S. navy. None of these reports were substantiated, however they were still considered a potential threat. Executive Order 9066, signed by President Roosevelt, gave the military permission to label land military areas and to keep out people who were seen as threats to national security. DeWitt named the west coast a military area in Proclamation 1 in March 1942. This gave him the right to remove all those who threatened the safety of the U.S. from the area. DeWitt believed that even 100 Japanese-Americans who were still loya l to Japan could compromise the safety of the U.S., therefore he decided that all people of Japanese ancestry had to be evacuated and placed in temporary relocation camps. He felt as did many others, that there was not enough time to investigate each individual person. In the interest of national security, DeWitt made the tough decision to take away the freedom of 120,000 people. This was entirely legal. Within the Constitution, the War Power Clause gives congress the right to make any laws required to win a war. The evacuation and internment of the Japanese was seen as a necessity to national security. The Japanese-Americans were a potential threat to the country and the war effort. The relocation of Japanese-Americans may have been legally carried out, but not without consequence. The Japanese-Americans who were forced to leave their homes lost a great deal. They were often given notice of the relocation only a few days in advance. They could only bring with them what they could c arry, and they were forced to abandon, give away or sell their assets at fractions of the actual worth. Before more permanent facilities could be built, the displaced people had to live in make shift detention areas, often nothing more than a converted horse stable. The actual relocation camps were an improvement from the temporary facilities but still far from adequate housing. At the camps they were forced to live in undesirable conditions where they had little or no privacy and only the luxuries that they brought with them. Their treatment was harsh and unethical, but considered a necessary consequence of war. After years of hardship, the Japanese in the relocation camps were ordered released. The threat of Japanese spies had passed and it was no longer deemed necessary to detain them. The Japanese-Americans had little or nothing to return to. Most had lost everything during their internment. Years later, in 1976, President Gerald R. Ford made Proclamation 4417, which made Execut ive Order No. 9066 completely void. The proclamation was also written to admit that the government had been wrong to treat its citizens with such disrespect. It states that the Japanese-Americans were extremely loyal and were unfairly suspected. In 1983 the government decided to give monetary compensation to the internees and to apologize and make up for their lost possessions and suffering. The Government is given the power to do what is necessary to win in times of war. This right is guaranteed in the Constitution of the United States. What is necessary to win a war includes the relocation of anyone posing a threat to our national security, and the Japanese seen as a threat during the war. The population redistribution of the Japanese-Americans in WWII, was a temporary solution to a potential threat to national security and it was a way to protect the Japanese from fearful and angry American citizens. American history gives an example of mishandled population redistributions. The atrocities against the American Indians in the 1800s are a brutal example of what can result when population redistributions are poorly executed. The U.S. relocated Indian tribes to reservations throughout the U.S. The Indians were forced to leave not only their homes but also their entire way of life behind. This was the end to years of bloodshed between the cavalry and the Indians. Unfortunately the Indians were killed nearly to extinction before they were relocated to these reservations. Did this preserve the lives of the remaining Indians or was it just one final step in taking the land where the Indians had resided for generations. Recent precedents exist to endorse the concept of forced Population redistributions to bring about domestic security. Since 1991, the newly created nations, which constitute the former Yugoslavia, have repeatedly turned to violence to solve their territorial disputes. Despite the internal peace that had existed in Yugoslavia during the Cold War, the demise of communism has awakened long-standing ethnic rivalries. Bosnia was the center of the fighting between the Serbs, Muslims, and Croats and Kosovo has been the center of fighting between the Serbs and Ethnic Albanians. Many of these people who were neighbors and lived in the same communities for decades, now find the thought of reestablishing their ethnically diverse communities an impossibility after so much bloodshed. Once peace has been established and the borders have been confirmed in Kosovo and the various regions of Yugoslavia, can an ethnic population redistribution insure the peace? As it was in the forced relocation of Japanese-Americans in WWII, the biggest obstacle to involuntary Population redistributions is the morality of such a program. To force people from the land and communities of their ancestors in order to procure the possibility of internal stability is an enormous price. The emotional and psychological toll to these people is likely far more costing tha n that which the Japanese-Americans faced. Simply because this has been their homeland for hundreds of years as opposed to a few generations. Unless such a population transfer is done under the protection of friendly troops or the United Nations, the results could be disastrous. Thousands in Bosnia and Kosovo have already died due to the ethnic cleansing policies of the rival powers. During World War II millions of Jewish people suffered indescribable torture at the hands of the Germans and millions more lost their lives. At the end of the war, hundreds of thousands of German civilians lost their lives after being inhumanly expelled from their homes without adequate food, clothing, transportation, or protection from vengeful enemies. The forced transfer of the German populations from their inherent regions were achieved, but at an appalling cost. Proper protection, logistical support, and assistance in establishing a livelihood are absolutely essential to a successful population red istribution. A population transfer could bring internal long-term stability to the regions of the former Yugoslavia, but it is a policy, which must be thoroughly planned and negotiated prior to being implemented. Maintaining the peace may be attained through other means without an ethnic redistribution, and this could be the morally correct decision. The United States has generally been successful with its melting pot society and can be used as an example of different cultures living together peacefully in the same nation. After peace has been established in the former Yugoslavia, a discussion about possible population transfers should be conducted at the United Nations with the rival powers present, so the most humane decision can be made regarding the citizens. It is impossible to decide for a race of people what their fate shall be and to remain confident that the decision is morally correct. Redistribution could prevent war and bloodshed, but it could also wipe out a way of life and in time a race of people. Are the people still the same people when they have been forced to change their way of life eventually killing the culture which made them who they were? It comes down to the choice of allowing the possible death of thousands to war or the possible death of a culture to forced population redistribution. Population redistribution could be the solution to lasting peace in nations faced with rivaling cultures due to ethnic diversity, but the peace would not come without a price. Population redistributions based on ethnicity have defused intense rivalries in the recent past, and could be a solution to the internal ethnic crises for nations such as the former Yugoslavia. Currently described by the media as ethnic cleansing, Population redistributions have been the focus of much controversy throughout U.S. and world history. To those affected, Population redistributions can be economically and emotionally devastating. It can also lead to enormous tragedies c ausing thousands of deaths when conducted in a brutal manner. The results of various population redistributions are examined throughout this paper with the focus on the Japanese Internment camps in the U.S. and the current crises in the former Yugoslavia. There are examples of population transfers that have taken place in the twentieth century. In 1923, Greece and Turkey signed the Treaty of Lausanne. The two rival nations agreed to expel 150,000 Greeks living in Turkey, and 388,000 Turks living in Greece back to their ethnic homelands. Except in Cyprus where the populations remained mixed. Turkey and Greece have not taken up arms against each other again. After World War II eight million people of German ethnicity were expelled from their native communities in Poland and throughout Eastern Europe, due to agreements made by the Allies at the Potsdam Conference. Hundreds of thousands of Germans died or were killed during the transfer due to the brutal manner in which it was carried o ut. Due to the lack of diversity and conflicting cultures the long-term results of the population transfer have ended internal ethnic problems in Poland since then. Israel expelled their own settlers from occupied land (which is currently the new Palestinian nation) in order to bring about a lasting peace between the two former rivals. After bombing Pearl Harbor, Hawaii on December 7, 1941, 120,000 Japanese and Japanese-Americans living in Oregon, Washington, California, and Arizona were relocated. They were forced from their homes and put in internment camps for their protection from the rage of the American people and for the sake of national security. Japanese-American internment camps like all issues involving race or war, raises the question of whether or not it was legal and ethical to force Japanese-Americans to move homes and livelihoods in early WWII. It is a difficult and controversial problem. When the decision to relocate thousands of Japanese-Americans was made; the act ions were considered to be constitutionally legal and seen by many as necessary. It has been argued as to whether or not it was necessary to put so many innocent people through frustration, suffering, and loss of not only their property but also their freedom. Even before the onset of war, due to the differences in their language, culture, communities, customs, and religion, the Japanese living in America were already alienated from much of society. This made it easier for Americans to justify to themselves the need for a temporary population redistribution of the Japanese-Americans. When the bombing of Pearl Harbor occurred, the American people were afraid of a Japanese attack and of the Japanese living near them on the West Coast. People believed their Japanese-American neighbors were the enemy. Americans were so enraged at Japan that they turned their anger towards Japanese-Americans in the forms of protests, discrimination and violent hatred. The Government, including President Franklin Delano Roosevelt, were pressured by the restlessness of the people, the threat of a Japanese attack, the threat of violence between Americans and Japanese-Americans and the lack of time to take action. Lieutenant General John L. DeWitt was chosen for the job of defending and protecting the West Coast. He became one of the biggest supporters of relocating the Japanese. The FBI began investigating and arresting people along the coast who were suspected of spying for enemy countries. Japanese-Americans were not the only people suspected of spying. Italians and Germans were also investigated and imprisoned. DeWitt received reports of acts of disloyalty to the U.S. and sabotage on the part of Japanese-Americans. He was also inundated with reports of unusual radio activity involving contact with Japanese vessels, of farmers burning their fields in the shapes of markers to aid Japanese pilots, and of fisherman monitoring and relaying to Japan the activity of the U.S. navy. None of these reports were substantiated, however they were still considered a potential threat. Executive Order 9066, signed by President Roosevelt, gave the military permission to label land military areas and to keep out people who were seen as threats to national security. DeWitt named the west coast a military area in Proclamation 1 in March 1942. This gave him the right to remove all those who threatened the safety of the U.S. from the area. DeWitt believed that even 100 Japanese-Americans who were still loyal to Japan could compromise the safety of the U.S., therefore he decided that all people of Japanese ancestry had to be evacuated and placed in temporary relocation camps. He felt as did many others, that there was not enough time to investigate each individual person. In the interest of national security, DeWitt made the tough decision to take away the freedom of 120,000 people. This was entirely legal. Within the Constitution, the War Power Clause gives congress the right to ma ke any laws required to win a war. The evacuation and internment of the Japanese was seen as a necessity to national security. The Japanese-Americans were a potential threat to the country and the war effort. The relocation of Japanese-Americans may have been legally carried out, but not without consequence. The Japanese-Americans who were forced to leave their homes lost a great deal. They were often given notice of the relocation only a few days in advance. They could only bring with them what they could carry, and they were forced to abandon, give away or sell their assets at fractions of the actual worth. Before more permanent facilities could be built, the displaced people had to live in make shift detention areas, often nothing more than a converted horse stable. The actual relocation camps were an improvement from the temporary facilities but still far from adequate housing. At the camps they were forced to live in undesirable conditions where they had little or no privacy an d only the luxuries that they brought with them. Their treatment was harsh and unethical, but considered a necessary consequence of war. After years of hardship, the Japanese in the relocation camps were ordered released. The threat of Japanese spies had passed and it was no longer deemed necessary to detain them. The Japanese-Americans had little or nothing to return to. Most had lost everything during their internment. Years later, in 1976, President Gerald R. Ford made Proclamation 4417, which made Executive Order No. 9066 completely void. The proclamation was also written to admit that the government had been wrong to treat its citizens with such disrespect. It states that the Japanese-Americans were extremely loyal and were unfairly suspected. In 1983 the government decided to give monetary compensation to the internees and to apologize and make up for their lost possessions and suffering. The Government is given the power to do what is necessary to win in times of war. This ri ght is guaranteed in the Constitution of the United States. What is necessary to win a war includes the relocation of anyone posing a threat to our national security, and the Japanese seen as a threat during the war. The population redistribution of the Japanese-Americans in WWII, was a temporary solution to a potential threat to national security and it was a way to protect the Japanese from fearful and angry American citizens. American history gives an example of mishandled population redistributions. The atrocities against the American Indians in the 1800s are a brutal example of what can result when population redistributions are poorly executed. The U.S. relocated Indian tribes to reservations throughout the U.S. The Indians were forced to leave not only their homes but also their entire way of life behind. This was the end to years of bloodshed between the cavalry and the Indians. Unfortunately the Indians were killed nearly to extinction before they were relocated to these re servations. Did this preserve the lives of the remaining Indians or was it just one final step in taking the land where the Indians had resided for generations. Recent precedents exist to endorse the concept of forced Population redistributions to bring about domestic security. Since 1991, the newly created nations, which constitute the former Yugoslavia, have repeatedly turned to violence to solve their territorial disputes. Despite the internal peace that had existed in Yugoslavia during the Cold War, the demise of communism has awakened long-standing ethnic rivalries. Bosnia was the center of the fighting between the Serbs, Muslims, and Croats and Kosovo has been the center of fighting between the Serbs and Ethnic Albanians. Many of these people who were neighbors and lived in the same communities for decades, now find the thought of reestablishing their ethnically diverse communities an impossibility after so much bloodshed. Once peace has been established and the borders have b een confirmed in Kosovo and the various regions of Yugoslavia, can an ethnic population redistribution insure the peace? As it was in the forced relocation of Japanese-Americans in WWII, the biggest obstacle to involuntary Population redistributions is the morality of such a program. To force people from the land and communities of their ancestors in order to procure the possibility of internal stability is an enormous price. The emotional and psychological toll to these people is likely far more costing than that which the Japanese-Americans faced. Simply because this has been their homeland for hundreds of years as opposed to a few generations. Unless such a population transfer is done under the protection of friendly troops or the United Nations, the results could be disastrous. Thousands in Bosnia and Kosovo have already died due to the ethnic cleansing policies of the rival powers. During World War II millions of Jewish people suffered indescribable torture at the hands of the Germans and millions more lost their lives. At the end of the war, hundreds of thousands of German civilians lost their lives after being inhumanly expelled from their homes without adequate food, clothing, transportation, or protection from vengeful enemies. The forced transfer of the German populations from their inherent regions were achieved, but at an appalling cost. Proper protection, logistical support, and assistance in establishing a livelihood are absolutely essential to a successful population redistribution. A population transfer could bring internal long-term stability to the regions of the former Yugoslavia, but it is a policy, which must be thoroughly planned and negotiated prior to being implemented. Maintaining the peace may be attained through other means without an ethnic redistribution, and this could be the morally correct decision. The United States has generally been successful with its melting pot society and can be used as an example of different cultures li ving together peacefully in the same nation. After peace has been established in the former Yugoslavia, a discussion about possible population transfers should be conducted at the United Nations with the rival powers present, so the most humane decision can be made regarding the citizens. It is impossible to decide for a race of people what their fate shall be and to remain confident that the decision is morally correct. Redistribution could prevent war and bloodshed, but it could also wipe out a way of life and in time a race of people. Are the people still the same people when they have been forced to change their way of life eventually killing the culture which made them who they were? It comes down to the choice of allowing the possible death of thousands to war or the possible death of a culture to forced population redistribution. Population redistribution could be the solution to lasting peace in nations faced with rivaling cultures due to ethnic diversity, but the peace woul d not come without a price. Bibliography: Marijuana Essay Thesis

Utley Food Markets

The new Utley management would like to establish a pay-for-performance system. What does this mean to the Utley management? Pay for performance system will have a possible number of consequences to the Utley management, these effects will be mainly centered on the way that the system is incorporated into the organization, the culture of the organization, the perception of the employees in the organization and how open the system will be as regards to its targets.Advertising We will write a custom critical writing sample on Utley Food Markets specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More In any organization, payment issues are considerably sensitive and it thus requires a positive tactical approach to achieve the desired results. As proposed by Blinder (2002) pay for performance system will work differently for different organizations. This is mainly because of the culture of the organization and the perception of the employees regarding the fa irness of the system. The Utley management ought to understand that there are advantages and disadvantages of implementing the system. On a positive note, the existing system on the employee’s performance appraisal has received negative perception from the employees; the introduction of the new system may be a major relief to the management and the employees of the organization. This will be the case only if the system meets the fundamental requirements of a pay-for performance system and is also properly integrated into the organization. The major objectives for this system includes but not limited to the following; employees will be motivated to be more productive as the results links direct with the payments of rewards in the organization, the employees will feel fairness in the system as they will be rewarded based on their efforts, and the continuous check and balance system will also guarantee the fairness of the system. To the management, they will require adequate fun ding of the system, supportive organization culture that can integrate payment for performance system, adequate training for supervisors and the employees, fair and effective supervisors and ongoing system evaluation process that ensures fairness. To the management of the Utley, this system will mean fairness, performance oriented organization and thus increase in the production of the company’s employees. The ongoing check and balance system will ensure that the system runs smoothly and necessary system modification done with regard to the changing time, culture and the size of the organization. What changes will have to be made in the way the system operates now? The system operation at the moment has received negative perception from the employees mainly because of two fundamental reasons; firstly the system is not open to employee’s suggestions and criticism, in essence the employees have less knowledge on how their performance evaluation is carried out.Advertising Looking for critical writing on business economics? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Secondly, the system is unfair in the eyes of the employees; this is because upon complaining, the management of the organization reacts in a way that shows some signs of unfairness by adding the complainant an amount slightly above the average pay. These provisions in the current system show lack of proper payment and performance evaluation system instituted in the organization to enhance fairness and openness. Podmoroff (2005) suggests that system improvement within the organization especially with regard to employees reward is critical for the organization’s survival. In order to improve the current system, it is necessary to address the fundamental weaknesses of the system. This system should thus be adjusted to be more open on how the employees’ performance is evaluated in order for the employees to have a chance to explain their poor performance whenever necessary. Involving employees in this critical decision making process will not only make the system fair but also motivate employees and thus enhance a performance oriented organization. The system should also form a department that deals with the grievances of employees within a union and those without the union. The adjustment of pay because the employee has complained needs to be removed and proper channels of payment adjustments put in place to deal with the situation. The pay for performance system should thus be borrowed and integrated into the organization in order to increase the fairness, efficiency and the performance of the Utley Food Markets organization. How might these changes be implemented? These changes that seek to address the payment issues in Utley Foods Market organization needs to be addressed with several things in mind. The existing organizations culture needs to be considered, the nature of the organization structure also n eeds to be considered, and the availability of funding option should also be addressed. Once these factors among others are considered by the management of Utley, the changing process will be easier and with fewer obstacles. The process of changing to the new system should ensure that the employees are involved. This can be achieved by proper communication and training in order for the employees to comprehend the organization’s objectives and their critical role in attaining these objectives and how the payment system will function.Advertising We will write a custom critical writing sample on Utley Food Markets specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More Assuming that these issues are self-explanatory will derail the objectives of restructuring process (Blinder, 2002). Transparency of the payment system is another critical consideration in adopting the payment method. The company’s employees should be informed on what desired behaviors and accomplishments will be contented by the new payment system. In addition to this, it will be necessary to ensure a consistent and positive feedback regarding the performance of the employees. At this stage, the supervisor or the management of Utley should train employees on the expected accomplishments, how well they should present their efforts and showing them their past ratings as regards to their performance and the rationale for the rating. After the integration of the new system following the mentioned factors, it is imperative for the Utley management to establish a check and balance system that will ensure the effectiveness and the supervisors discretion in evaluating and consequently rewarding the organization’s employees. It is important for the pay system to be fair both in the perceived angle and the actual angle regarding the employee and the organization respectively. When this is the case, credibility and motivating power will be enhanced once the system is in place. Which of the nonmonetary changes will help motivate better performance? Defend your position There are a number of considerations that the Utley management should adopt and integrate into the organization to improve and motivate the company’s employees without necessarily biasing towards rewarding them monetarily. Creating a sound environment is the initial step in enhancing the workers performance. The environment where employees can interact freely with themselves and the management will ensure their personal growth and the feeling of belonging. When the management inquires problems about their personal lives and make positive contributions with advice and show of concern has the greatest impact on the company’s employees, this will translate to performance in the organization. Arranging seminars and training sessions that addresses different careers of the organizational employees is another imperative step in improving the employee’s per formance. These seminars will not only promote the employees performance rate but also motivate them to achieve their personal goals in the organization (Bruce, 2008).Advertising Looking for critical writing on business economics? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Giving employees adequate holidays to attend their personal issues is also another important step in motivating them. Employees who are exhausted and have little time for their personal issues will always perform below their expected standards. It is thus necessary to improve on employee’s holidays in order for them to refresh themselves and have a time off their usual work. The other significant issue that the management of Utley needs to ensure is the smooth flow of communication process, this will enhance a sound environment for the interaction process required in any organization to produce quality work and thus meet the objectives of the organization. In essence, communication is the key to successful motivation process since the management will be in a good position to understand the employee’s demands and grievances; in turn this will increase their performance in the field. References Blinder, A. (2002). Paying for productivity: a look at the evidence. Chicago, IL: Brookings Institution Press. Bruce, A., Pepitone, J.(2008). Motivating employees. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Pp 123-145. Podmoroff , D.(2005). 365 ways to motivate and reward your employees every day– with little or no money. New York, NY: Atlantic Publishing Company. Pp. 134-147. This critical writing on Utley Food Markets was written and submitted by user Jaylen Ochoa to help you with your own studies. You are free to use it for research and reference purposes in order to write your own paper; however, you must cite it accordingly. You can donate your paper here.